Global Spine Journal · 2022 · 18 citations · 21 references
MedicineOrthopedic SurgerySurgeryMedical RoboticsOrthopedicsSpine SurgeryLumbar Spine SurgeryMinimally Invasive Spine SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryRobot-assisted SurgerySpinal FusionSpinal InstrumentationLateral Interbody FusionLateral Lumbar Interbody FusionLateral Spinal FusionLumbar Spinal FusionMinimally Invasive Lumbar FusionMinimally Invasive Spinal FusionPosterior InstrumentationSurgical Technique Selection
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine safety and short-term outcomes of single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with bilateral posterior instrumentation and robotic assistance. The article also describes surgical technique considerations for the procedure. METHODS: 20 patients underwent single-position LLIF with posterior instrumentation and robotic assistance. The patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Average operative time was 211 ± 34 minutes, average blood loss was 51.25 ± 17 cc's, and average length of stay was 1.4 ± .75 days. There were no intraoperative complications, readmissions, revision surgeries, and no incidence of hardware malposition. Significant improvement in pain and ODI scores was noted at 3 month follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated safety and short-term clinical efficacy of minimally invasive single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral posterior instrumentation utilizing robotic assistance and navigation. There are certain surgical technique considerations that must be followed to ensure optimal surgical workflow and predictable outcomes.
21
Rates of Infection After Spine Surgery Based on 108,419 Procedures
Justin S. Smith, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Charles A. Sansur et al. · Spine · 2010 · 407 citations
Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques
David H. Ge, Nicholas Stekas, Christopher Varlotta et al. · Spine · 2018 · 123 citations