Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · 2022 · 37 citations · 1.5K references
Natural SciencesPhysicsAstrophysicsCosmologyParticle PhysicsCosmological ParametersDark MatterPhysical CosmologyTheoretical CosmologyCosmological Parameter EstimationHubble Constant MeasurementHubble Constant TensionHubble Parameter TensionHubble TensionStandard Cosmological ModelStandard Model TestsSystematic Errors
The standard Λ Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model provides a good description of a wide range of astrophysical and cosmological data. However, there are a few big open questions that make the standard model look like an approximation to a more realistic scenario yet to be found. In this paper, we list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant H0, the σ8–S8 tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the 5.0σ tension between the Planck CMB estimate of the Hubble constant H0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the Planck CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density Ωm, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure (σ8,fσ8). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the H0–S8 tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals. Finally, we give an overview of upgraded experiments and next-generation space missions and facilities on Earth that will be of crucial importance to address all these open questions.
1K
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Adam G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 1998 · 19.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber et al. · The Astrophysical Journal · 1999 · 17.9K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +13
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott et al. · Physical Review Letters · 2016 · 14.3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +15