Publication | Open Access
Do <sup>2</sup>H and <sup>18</sup>O in leaf water reflect environmental drivers differently?
70
Citations
72
References
2022
Year
We compiled hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope compositions (δ<sup>2</sup> H and δ<sup>18</sup> O) of leaf water from multiple biomes to examine variations with environmental drivers. Leaf water δ<sup>2</sup> H was more closely correlated with δ<sup>2</sup> H of xylem water or atmospheric vapour, whereas leaf water δ<sup>18</sup> O was more closely correlated with air relative humidity. This resulted from the larger proportional range for δ<sup>2</sup> H of meteoric waters relative to the extent of leaf water evaporative enrichment compared with δ<sup>18</sup> O. We next expressed leaf water as isotopic enrichment above xylem water (Δ<sup>2</sup> H and Δ<sup>18</sup> O) to remove the impact of xylem water isotopic variation. For Δ<sup>2</sup> H, leaf water still correlated with atmospheric vapour, whereas Δ<sup>18</sup> O showed no such correlation. This was explained by covariance between air relative humidity and the Δ<sup>18</sup> O of atmospheric vapour. This is consistent with a previously observed diurnal correlation between air relative humidity and the deuterium excess of atmospheric vapour across a range of ecosystems. We conclude that <sup>2</sup> H and <sup>18</sup> O in leaf water do indeed reflect the balance of environmental drivers differently; our results have implications for understanding isotopic effects associated with water cycling in terrestrial ecosystems and for inferring environmental change from isotopic biomarkers that act as proxies for leaf water.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1