Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering · 2022 · 67 citations · 37 references
Rock TestingEngineeringMachine LearningMechanical EngineeringStrain RateGeological ModelingGeotechnical EngineeringData ScienceMineral Prospectivity AnalysisCompressive StrengthStress WaveEarthquake EngineeringStructural Health MonitoringRock PropertiesGeotechnical PropertyCivil EngineeringRate-dependent Compressive StrengthGeomechanicsRock BurstRock MechanicsRandom Forest
Accurate prediction of compressive strength of rocks relies on the rate-dependent behaviors of rocks, and correlation among the geometrical, physical, and mechanical properties of rocks. However, these properties may not be easy to control in laboratory experiments, particularly in dynamic compression experiments. By training three machine learning models based on the support vector machine (SVM), back-propagation neural network (BPNN), and random forest (RF) algorithms, we isolated different input parameters, such as static compressive strength, P-wave velocity, specimen dimension, grain size, bulk density, and strain rate, to identify their importance in the strength prediction. Our results demonstrated that the RF algorithm shows a better performance than the other two algorithms. The strain rate is a key input parameter influencing the performance of these models, while the others (e.g. static compressive strength and P-wave velocity) are less important as their roles can be compensated by alternative parameters. The results also revealed that the effect of specimen dimension on the rock strength can be overshadowed at high strain rates, while the effect on the dynamic increase factor (i.e. the ratio of dynamic to static compressive strength) becomes significant. The dynamic increase factors for different specimen dimensions bifurcate when the strain rate reaches a relatively high value, a clue to improve our understanding of the transitional behaviors of rocks from low to high strain rates.
37
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 119.3K citations · Full text
Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky et al. · 2014 · 34.2K citations
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
David E. Rumelhart, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Ronald J. Williams · Nature · 1986 · 29.7K citations
A tutorial on support vector regression
Alex Smola, Bernhard Schölkopf · Statistics and Computing · 2004 · 12.6K citations
Support Vector Regression Machines
Harris Drucker, Christopher J. C. Burges, Linda Kaufman et al. · 1996 · 4.2K citations