Publication | Open Access
Overview on the management of radioactive waste from fusion facilities: ITER, demonstration machines and power plants
57
Citations
42
References
2022
Year
Nuclear Waste ManagementEngineeringEnergy EfficiencyRadioactive WasteFusion PowerFusion WasteFusion MaterialsFusion FacilitiesNuclear Fusion PlantsChemical EngineeringNuclear Fuel EnrichmentNuclear MaterialsFusion Reactor MaterialNuclear Reactor OperationMaterials ScienceNuclear Systems EngineeringFusion EnergyNuclear ReactionsRapid Radioactivity DecayDemonstration MachinesNuclear EngineeringNuclear PowerRadioactive Waste DisposalEnvironmental EngineeringFusion System Design
Abstract In the absence of official standards and guidelines for nuclear fusion plants, fusion designers adopted, as far as possible, well-established standards for fission-based nuclear power plants (NPPs). This often implies interpretation and/or extrapolation, due to differences in structures, systems and components, materials, safety mitigation systems, risks, etc. This approach could result in the consideration of overconservative measures that might lead to an increase in cost and complexity with limited or negligible improvements. One important topic is the generation of radioactive waste in fusion power plants. Fusion waste is significantly different to fission NPP waste, i.e. the quantity of fusion waste is much larger. However, it mostly comprises low-level waste (LLW) and intermediate level waste (ILW). Notably, the waste does not contain many long-lived isotopes, mainly tritium and other activation isotopes but no-transuranic elements. An important benefit of fusion employing reduced-activation materials is the lower decay heat removal and rapid radioactivity decay overall. The dominant fusion wastes are primarily composed of structural materials, such as different types of steel, including reduced activation ferritic martensitic steels, such as EUROFER97 and F82H, AISI 316L, bainitic, and JK2LB. The relevant long-lived radioisotopes come from alloying elements, such as niobium, molybdenum, nickel, carbon, nitrogen, copper and aluminum and also from uncontrolled impurities (of the same elements, but also, e.g. of potassium and cobalt). After irradiation, these isotopes might preclude disposal in LLW repositories. Fusion power should be able to avoid creating high-level waste, while the volume of fusion ILW and LLW will be significant, both in terms of pure volume and volume per unit of electricity produced. Thus, efforts to recycle and clear are essential to support fusion deployment, reclaim resources (through less ore mining) and minimize the radwaste burden for future generations.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1