International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2022 · 79 citations · 27 references
Public AffairsHealth SystemsHealth Services ResearchHealth Systems EvaluationSystems AnalysisHealth Program EvaluationHealth Services EvaluationTheory-based EvaluationAdaptive SystemsHealth System Performance AssessmentImplementation Evaluation FrameworksOverweight In ChildhoodPublic Health Program EvaluationSystem BoundariesSystems-level Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Systems thinking embraces the complexity of public health problems, including childhood overweight and obesity. It aids in understanding how factors are interrelated, and it can be targeted to produce favourable changes in a system. There is a growing call for systems approaches in public health research, yet limited practical guidance is available on how to evaluate public health programmes within complex adaptive systems. The aim of this paper is to present an evaluation framework that supports researchers in designing systems evaluations in a comprehensive and practical way. METHODS: We searched the literature for existing public health systems evaluation studies. Key characteristics on how to conduct a systems evaluation were extracted and compared across studies. Next, we overlaid the identified characteristics to the context of the Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) programme evaluation and analyzed which characteristics were essential to carry out the LIKE evaluation. This resulted in the Evaluation of Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems (ENCOMPASS) framework. RESULTS: The ENCOMPASS framework includes five iterative stages: (1) adopting a system dynamics perspective on the overall evaluation design; (2) defining the system boundaries; (3) understanding the pre-existing system to inform system changes; (4) monitoring dynamic programme output at different system levels; and (5) measuring programme outcome and impact in terms of system changes. CONCLUSIONS: The value of ENCOMPASS lies in the integration of key characteristics from existing systems evaluation studies, as well as in its practical, applied focus. It can be employed in evaluating public health programmes in complex adaptive systems. Furthermore, ENCOMPASS provides guidance for the entire evaluation process, all the way from understanding the system to developing actions to change it and to measuring system changes. By the nature of systems thinking, the ENCOMPASS framework will likely evolve further over time, as the field expands with more completed studies.
27
Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research
Thaddeus R. Miller, Timothy D. Baird, Caitlin M. Littlefield et al. · Ecology and Society · 2008 · 531 citations · Full text
Graham Moore, Rhiannon Evans, Jemma Hawkins et al. · Evaluation · 2018 · 486 citations · Full text
Wilma Waterlander, Angie Luna Pinzon, Arnoud P. Verhoeff et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2020 · 267 citations · Full text