European Journal of Breast Health · 2022 · 11 citations · 19 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyUltrasonographyBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ExaminationBreast ImagingBreast PathologyBreast UltrasonographyBreast UltrasoundBreast Imaging FindingsBreast Lesion DiagnosisBreast Mass ClassificationBreast Tumor ClassificationDifferential Diagnosis CriteriaMagnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion EvaluationMammographyPapillary Breast Lesions
Objective: We aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared. Results: = 0.017). Conclusion: Radiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.
19
The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast
Puay Hoon Tan, Ian O. Ellis, Kimberly H. Allison et al. · Histopathology · 2020 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Osman Zekioğlu, Yı́ldı́z Erhan, Hati̇ce Bayramoǧlu et al. · Histopathology · 2004 · 169 citations