BMJ Open · 2022 · 30 citations · 47 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious Disease ControlInfectious DiseasesImmunizationInfectious Disease EpidemiologyVaccinologyVaccinationVaccine EffectivenessVaccine EfficacyVaccine-preventable DiseasesJapanese Encephalitis VaccinationMulticriteria AppraisalMulticriteria Decision AnalysisPerformance Matrix EvaluationPriority Setting In VaccinationVaccination Decision-makingVaccination PrioritizationVaccine Efficacy Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To prioritise vaccines for introduction in Bangladesh. METHODS: Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) process was used to prioritise potential vaccines for introduction in Bangladesh. A set of criteria were identified, weighted and assigned scores by relevant stakeholders (n=14) during workshop A. The performance matrix of the data of vaccines against the criteria set was constructed and validated with the experts (n=6) in workshop B. The vaccines were ranked and appraised by another group of stakeholders (n=10) in workshop C, and the final workshop D involved the dissemination of the findings to decision-makers (n=28). RESULTS: Five criteria including incidence rate, case fatality rate, vaccine efficacy, size of the population at risk and type of population at risk were used quantitatively to evaluate and to score the vaccines. Two other criteria, cost-effectiveness and outbreak potentiality, were considered qualitatively. On deliberation, the Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine was ranked top to be recommended for introduction in Bangladesh. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the MCDA results, JE vaccine is planned to be recommended to the decision-makers for introduction into the national vaccine benefit package. The policymakers support the use of systematic evidence-based decision-making processes such as MCDA for vaccine introduction in Bangladesh, and to prioritise health interventions in the country.
47
John C. Victor, Michael J. Dallas, Michele L. Coia et al. · The Lancet · 2010 · 832 citations
Praveen Thokala, Nancy Devlin, Kevin Marsh et al. · Value in Health · 2016 · 721 citations · Full text