Neuro-Oncology Advances · 2021 · 12 citations · 33 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyMagnetic Resonance BiophysicsCerebral Blood FlowGlioblastomaImaging BiomarkersNeuro-oncology ImagingTherapy Response AssessmentTissue Perfusion AssessmentBland-altman PlotDynamic Tissue Perfusion ImagingImage Acquisition QualityPerfusion Parameter EstimationRepeatabilityTracer Kinetic AnalysisTreatment Response BiomarkersTumor Perfusion Analysis
Abstract Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters have been shown to be biomarkers for treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM). However, variations in analysis and measurement methodology complicate determination of biological changes measured via DCE. The aim of this study is to quantify DCE-MRI variations attributable to analysis methodology and image quality in GBM patients. Methods The Extended Tofts model (eTM) and Leaky Tracer Kinetic Model (LTKM), with manually and automatically segmented vascular input functions (VIFs), were used to calculate perfusion kinetic parameters from 29 GBM patients with double-baseline DCE-MRI data. DCE-MRI images were acquired 2–5 days apart with no change in treatment. Repeatability of kinetic parameters was quantified with Bland–Altman and percent repeatability coefficient (%RC) analysis. Results The perfusion parameter with the least RC was the plasma volume fraction (vp), with a %RC of 53%. The extra-cellular extra-vascular volume fraction (ve) %RC was 82% and 81%, for extended Tofts-Kety Model (eTM) and LTKM respectively. The %RC of the volume transfer rate constant (Ktrans) was 72% for the eTM, and 82% for the LTKM, respectively. Using an automatic VIF resulted in smaller %RCs for all model parameters, as compared to manual VIF. Conclusions As much as 72% change in Ktrans (eTM, autoVIF) can be attributable to non-biological changes in the 2–5 days between double-baseline imaging. Poor Ktrans repeatability may result from inferior temporal resolution and short image acquisition time. This variation suggests DCE-MRI repeatability studies should be performed institutionally, using an automatic VIF method and following quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance guidelines.
33
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Kenneth Clark, Bruce A. Vendt, Kirk Smith et al. · Journal of Digital Imaging · 2013 · 4.6K citations · Full text
How Should Relative Changes be Measured?
Leo Törnqvist, Pentti Vartia, Yrjö Vartia · The American Statistician · 1985 · 389 citations
How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study
James N. Scott, Penny Brasher, Robert J. Sevick et al. · Neurology · 2002 · 370 citations
Medicine, Child Health, Pediatrics +15
Blood flow effects in magnetic resonance imaging
Leon Axel · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1984 · 327 citations
How Should Relative Changes Be Measured?
Leo Tornqvist, Pentti Vartia, Yrjö Vartia · The American Statistician · 1985 · 226 citations