Radiation Oncology · 2022 · 14 citations · 20 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyRadiation DosimetryTreatment PlanningUncertainty QuantificationCancer Treatment PlanningDose Uncertainty AnalysisPatient-specific DosimetryRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning Dose CalculationPlan Robustness AssessmentPlan Robustness EvaluationRadiotherapy Plan EvaluationRobustness EvaluationTreatment Plan EvaluationTreatment Planning DosimetryVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy DosimetryVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity to set up the uncertainty of VMAT plans in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment by proposing a plan robustness evaluation method. Methods 10 patients were selected for this study. A 2-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan was generated for each patient using Varian Eclipse (13.6 Version) treatment planning system (TPS). 5 uncertainty plans (U-plans) were recalculated based on the first 5 times set-up errors acquired from cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT). The dose differences of the original plan and perturbed plan corresponded to the plan robustness for the structure. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissues complication probability (NTCP) were calculated for biological evaluation. Results The mean dose differences of D 98% and D 95% (ΔD 98% and ΔD 95% ) of PTVp were respectively 3.30 Gy and 2.02 Gy. The ΔD 98% and ΔD 95% of CTVp were 1.12 Gy and 0.58 Gy. The ΔD 98% and ΔD 95% of CTVn were 1.39 Gy and 1.03 Gy, distinctively lower than those in PTVn (2.8 Gy and 2.0 Gy). The CTV-to-PTV margin increased the robustness of CTVs. The ΔD 98% and ΔD 95% of GTVp were 0.56 Gy and 0.33 Gy. GTVn exhibited strong robustness with little variation of D 98% (0.64 Gy) and D 95% (0.39 Gy). No marked mean dose variations of D mean were seen. The mean reduction of TCP (ΔTCP) in GTVp and CTVp were respectively 0.4% and 0.3%. The mean ΔTCPs of GTVn and CTVn were 0.92% and 1.3% respectively. The CTV exhibited the largest ΔTCP (2.2%). In OARs, the brain stem exhibited weak robustness due to their locations in the vicinity of PTV. Bilateral parotid glands were sensitive to set-up uncertainty with a mean reduction of NTCP (ΔNTCP) of 6.17% (left) and 7.70% (right). The D max of optical nerves and lens varied slightly. Conclusion VMAT plans had a strong sensitivity to set-up uncertainty in NPC radiotherapy, with increasing risk of underdose of tumor and overdose of vicinal OARs. We proposed an effective method to evaluate the plan robustness of VMAT plans. Plan robustness and complexity should be taken into account in photon radiotherapy.
20
K. S. Clifford Chao, Joseph O. Deasy, Jerry Markman et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2001 · 600 citations