Advances in Urology · 2021 · 17 citations · 24 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyDiagnostic ImagingUltrasonographyUltrasoundImage-guided Tumor AblationMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstate BiopsyProstate CancerProstate ImagingProstate SurgeryFocal Prostate AblationFunctional Outcomes After SurgeryHifu AblationMultiparametric ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultiparametric UltrasonographyProstate Cancer Localization
Objective. The study aimed at investigating the outcome of prostate HIFU focal therapy using the MRI-US fusion platform for treatment localization and delivery. Methods. It is a prospectively designed case series of HIFU focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The inclusion criteria include clinical tumor stage ≤T2, visible index lesion on multiparametric MRI less than 20 mm in diameter, absence of Gleason 5 pattern on prostate biopsy, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml. HIFU focal therapy was performed in the conventional manner in the beginning 50% of the series, whereas the subsequent cases were performed with MRI-US fusion platform. The primary outcome was treatment failure rate which is defined by the need of salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included tumor recurrence in follow-up biopsy, PSA change, perioperative complications, and postoperative functional outcomes. Results. Twenty patients underwent HIFU focal ablation. HIFU on an MRI-US fusion platform had a trend of a longer total operative time than the conventional counterpart (124.2 min vs. 107.1 min, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.066</a:mn> </a:math> ). There was no difference in the mean ablation volume to lesion volume ratio between the two. The mean PSA percentage change from baseline to 6-month is more significant in the conventional group (63.3% vs. 44.6%, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>0.035</c:mn> </c:math> ). No suspicious lesion was seen at 6-month mpMRI in all 20 patients. Two patients, one from each group, eventually underwent radical treatment because of the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in the form of out-of-field recurrences during follow-up biopsy. No significant difference was observed before and after HIFU concerning uroflowmetry, SF-12 score, and EPIC-26 score. It was observed that energy used per volume was positively correlated with PSA density of the patient (r = 0.6364, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.014</e:mn> </e:math> ). Conclusion. In conclusion, HIFU with conventional or MRI-US fusion platform provided similar oncological and functional outcomes.
24
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Antti Rannikko, Marcelo Borghi et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 3K citations · Full text
Mack Roach, Gerald E. Hanks, Howard D. Thames et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2006 · 2.7K citations
Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
Thomas A. Stamey, Norman Yang, Alan R. Hay et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1987 · 2.5K citations