Funding Democracy: Public Media and Democratic Health in 33 Countries

TLDR

The study investigates how public media systems influence democratic health across 33 countries worldwide. Using 2018–2019 national economic, funding, audience, and regulatory data, the authors correlate these variables with democracy indices and extend Hallin and Mancini’s typology via hierarchical cluster analysis. They identify five public media system models, including three mixed types, and find that secure funding and strong independence protections consistently correlate with healthier democracies.

Abstract

This study examines whether and how public media systems contribute to the health of democracies in 33 countries in Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, the Middle East, Latin America, and South America. We gather national economic data and public media funding levels, audience shares, and regulatory data, primarily for 2018 and 2019 but in some cases earlier, due to lack of available data. We then assess correlations with strength of democracy indices and extend Hallin and Mancini's typology of North American and European media systems through hierarchical cluster analysis of these 33 countries. We find five models of public media systems around the world, ranging from “state-administered” systems with low levels of independence (Botswana and Tunisia) to systems aligning with Hallin and Mancini's “Democratic Corporatist” model, with strong and secure (multiyear) funding, large audience shares, and strong regulatory protection for their independence. In between, we identify three mixed models: a “Liberal-Pluralist” model, a “Direct Funding” model, and a “Commercial–Public” model. Correlations and cluster analyses show that high levels of secure funding for public media systems and strong structural protections for the political and economic independence of those systems are consistently and positively correlated with healthy democracies.