Pediatric Radiology · 2021 · 20 citations · 14 references
MedicinePediatricsRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyPediatric RadiologyComputed TomographyPatient-specific DosimetryPediatric ImagingPhantom DosimetryRadiation Exposure In ChildhoodComputed Tomography Dose IndicesComputed Tomography Dose MeasurementComputed Tomography Phantom DosimetryDose-length ProductMedical Imaging Radiation DosePediatric DosimetryPediatric Head ImagingPhantom-based Dose Measurement
Abstract Background Radiation dose metrics vary by the calibration reference phantom used to report doses. By convention, 16-cm diameter cylindrical polymethyl-methacyrlate phantoms are used for head imaging and 32-cm diameter phantoms are used for body imaging in adults. Actual usage patterns in children remain under-documented. Objective This study uses the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry to describe phantom selection in children by patient age, body region and scanner manufacturer, and the consequent impact on radiation doses. Materials and methods For 106,837 pediatric computed tomography (CT) exams collected between Jan. 1, 2015, and Nov. 2, 2020, in children up to 17 years of age from 118 hospitals and imaging facilities, we describe reference phantom use patterns by body region, age and manufacturer, and median and 75th-percentile dose–length product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) doses when using 16-cm vs. 32-cm phantoms. Results There was relatively consistent phantom selection by body region. Overall, 98.0% of brain and skull examinations referenced 16-cm phantoms, and 95.7% of chest, 94.4% of abdomen and 100% of cervical-spine examinations referenced 32-cm phantoms. Only GE deviated from this practice, reporting chest and abdomen scans using 16-cm phantoms with some frequency in children up to 10 years of age. DLP and CTDI vol values from 16-cm phantom-referenced scans were 2–3 times higher than 32-cm phantom-referenced scans. Conclusion Reference phantom selection is highly consistent, with a small but significant number of abdomen and chest scans (~5%) using 16-cm phantoms in younger children, which produces DLP values approximately twice as high as exams referenced to 32-cm phantoms
14
Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998
Dale L. Preston, Elaine Ron, Shoji Tokuoka et al. · Radiation Research · 2007 · 1.7K citations
National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003
P C Shrimpton, Mathew Hillier, Maria Lewis et al. · British Journal of Radiology · 2006 · 565 citations
Patient Radiation Doses from Adult and Pediatric CT
Walter Huda, Awais Z Vance · American Journal of Roentgenology · 2007 · 251 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Radiology +16