Text REtrieval Conference · 2001 · 25 citations · 5 references
ComputingArabicComputer ScienceComputational LinguisticsInformation RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingCross-language Information RetrievalEvaluation Of Retrieval SystemsRetrieval ModelsText Similarity AnalysisWord Sense DisambiguationCross-language RetrievalCross-language Web SearchCross-lingual Information RetrievalCross-lingual RetrievalCross-lingual SearchSimilarity MeasuresTrec EvaluationTrec Evaluation Framework
For TREC-10, we participated in the adhoc and manual web tracks and in both the site-finding and cross-lingual tracks. For the adhoc track, we did extensive calibrations and learned that combining similarity measures yields little improvement. This year, we focused on a single highperformance similarity measure. For site finding, we implemented several algorithms that did well on the data provided for calibration, but poorly on the real dataset. For the cross-lingual track, we calibrated on the monolingual collection, and developed new Arabic stemming algorithms as well as a novel dictionary-based means of cross-lingual retrieval. Our results in this track were quite promising, with seventeen of our queries performing at or above the median.
5
Pivoted Document Length Normalization
Amit Singhal, Chris Buckley, Manclar Mitra · ACM SIGIR Forum · 2017 · 863 citations
An analysis of statistical and syntactic phrases
Mandar Mitra, Chris Buckley, Amit Singhal et al. · 1997 · 210 citations
Analyses of multiple-evidence combinations for retrieval strategies
Abdur Chowdhury, Ophir Frieder, David A. Grossman et al. · 2001 · 18 citations