Foreign Affairs · 2000 · 30 citations · 0 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceStrategyDiplomacyInternational SecuritySecurity StudiesNational SecurityNuclear DoctrineNuclear NonproliferationNuclear StrategyNuclear Weapons PolicyStrategic StabilityDefense BuildupNuclear DiplomacyNuclear Energy PoliticsNuclear Force ModernizationNuclear Weapons EffectsNuclear Weapons TechnologyStrategic ModernizationUnited States Foreign Policy
A decade after the end of the Cold War, the world faces the risk of new strategic instability. Policymakers in Washington, Beijing, and Moscow are moving toward decisions that may unintentionally increase nuclear dangers. The heart of the problem lies in insufficient attention to the intersection of three policy currents: American missile defenses, U.S.-Russian nuclear diplomacy, and Chinese nuclear modernization. Unless all three are given full consideration, American decisions in coming months could lead China to initiate a major buildup of its nuclear forces, increase Sino-Russian strategic cooperation, and jeopardize both efforts at arms reduction and the effectiveness of any American missile defenses that are eventually deployed. A lingering bipolar mindset has left China the forgotten nuclear power. It is time that Washington turned its eyes to the East and came to grips with the fact that over the next decade it will likely be China, not Russia or any rogue, whose nuclear weapons policy will concern America most. The People's Republic has been modernizing its modest nuclear arsenal for 20 years and will continue to do so