Colopexy of the equine large colon: Comparison of two techniques

Mark D. Markel, Daniel J. Dreyfuss, Dennis M. Meagher

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 1988 · 17 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

Summary A study was designed to evaluate 2 colopexy techniques (A and B) in 8 clinically normal horses to determine which technique would prevent recurrence of large-colon displacement and/or volvulus. For technique A, 35 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. For technique B, the medial free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the medial free band of the right ventral colon, and 8 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. One horse from each group was euthanatized at 6 months, and another at 12 months after surgery. The position of the large colon, the integrity of the colopexy, and other adhesions within the abdominal cavity were evaluated. At necropsy, attempts were made to manually create displacement and volvulus of the large colon. The remaining horses in each group were anesthetized 6 months or 12 months after surgery, and the integrity of the colopexy was evaluated. After a 60-day recovery period, these horses were exercised for 2 months. Although each horse initially lost weight, the weight of all but 2 was acceptable at the conclusion of the study. Two horses that had technique-B colopexies had progressive weight loss serious enough to warrant euthanasia. Both colopexy techniques prevented manual creation of large-colon displacement and large-colon volvulus centered at the sternal and diaphragmatic flexures. Technique-A colopexy also prevented manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base. Technique B did not prevent creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base, although it did make creation of volvulus difficult. Because of ease, short surgical time, and minimal complications, technique A was recommended for horses with recurrence of large-colon displacement or volvulus. Technique B was not recommended, because of its inability to prevent manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base and because of its potential for causing weight loss.