Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · 2021 · 24 citations · 15 references
HumanitiesMusicologyMusic AestheticsMusic CriticismMusic SociologyAesthetic Response To MusicAesthetic Theories Of MusicMusical GenresMusical MeaningAesthetic Judgments Of MusicGenre PhilosophyGenre-specific InterpretationGestalt PrinciplesMusical AppreciationNoise Music AestheticsRock Music Criticism
Abstract In this article, I raise a simple but surprisingly vexing question: What makes heavy metal heavy? We commonly describe music as “heavy,” whether as criticism or praise. But what does “heavy” mean? How is it applied as an aesthetic term? Drawing on sociological and musicological studies of heavy metal, as well as recent work on the aesthetics of rock music, I discuss the relevant musical properties of heaviness. The modest aim of this article, however, is to show the difficulty, if not impossibility, of this seemingly straightforward task. I first address the difficulties of identifying the defining features, or “Gestalt,” of heavy metal that would allow us to treat heaviness as a genre concept. Next, I discuss both the merits and the limits of analyzing heaviness in terms of an aesthetics of “noise” in rock music developed in recent philosophy of music. In the remaining sections, I consider other nonaesthetic features relevant to aesthetic judgments of heaviness and show that the term ‘heavy’ is conceptually inarticulable, if not irreducible. This, I conclude, has partly to do with the radically different, sometimes incompatible, musical properties present in the perception of musical heaviness.
15
From the New York Times Magazine
Minsky, Paul Hyman · 1979 · 6.9K citations
Kendall L. Walton · The Philosophical Review · 1970 · 661 citations
Frank Sibley · The Philosophical Review · 1959 · 315 citations