JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2021 · 14 citations · 27 references
MedicineBioengineeringCardiologyBiosensorsElectrophysiologySensorsAtrial FibrillationCardiac Signal ProcessingCardiovascular MonitoringElectrocardiographyHeart FailureWearable BiosensorsAtrial Fibrillation MonitoringCardiac Implantable DevicesCardiac Monitoring SystemsCardiac Sensing DevicesDevice-detected Atrial FibrillationImplantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsMultisensor DiagnosticsSensor Data Collection
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the temporal association between changes in physiologic heart failure (HF) sensors, atrial fibrillation (AF) progression, and clinical HF in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable defibrillators (CRT-D) designed to monitor AF and HF daily. BACKGROUND: AF is a common comorbidity in HF; however, it is unclear if HF triggers AF, or vice-versa. Current implantable cardiac devices have sensors capable of quantifying HF status, which permits a greater understanding of the impact of AF on HF status and may help guide treatment. METHODS: The MultiSENSE (Multisensor Chronic Evaluation in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) study collected multiple sensor data indicative of HF status in patients with CRT-D followed for up to 12 months. Patients were grouped according to their longest daily AF burden: 1) at least 24 hours of AF (HIGH AF); 2) between 6 minutes and 24 hours (MID AF); and 3) <6 minutes (NO AF). Sensor data were aligned to the first qualifying AF event or a randomly selected day for patients in the NO AF group. RESULTS: Among 869 patients with daily AF data available, 98 patients had HIGH AF, 141 patients MID AF, and 630 patients NO AF. At baseline, history of AF, N-terminal pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide and device-measured S3 were associated with development of AF. HeartLogic index increased before AF onset (Δ HeartLogic = 9.83 ± 2.49; P < 0.001). Multivariable time-dependent Cox regression showed an increased risk for HF events following a 24-hour AF episode compared with no 24-hour AF (hazard ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.74). CONCLUSIONS: Device-measured HF indicators worsened before AF onset, whereas clinical HF deterioration only became apparent after AF occurred. Thus, the sensitivity of methods to ascertain AF and HF status appear to influence the direction of perceived causality. (Multisensor Chronic Evaluation in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients [MultiSENSE]; NCT01128166).
27
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Clyde W. Yancy, Mariell Jessup, Biykem Bozkurt et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013 · 12.6K citations
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Stuart J. Connolly, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Salim Yusuf et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 11.2K citations · Full text
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Manesh R. Patel, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Jyotsna Garg et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 9.4K citations · Full text
Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Christopher B. Granger, John H. Alexander, John J.V. McMurray et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 8.9K citations · Full text