European Radiology · 2021 · 39 citations · 32 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyGenitourinary RadiologyProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingProstatic PathologyTumor CharacterizationTumor GradingCohort Study InvestigationInfiltrationMultiparametric ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance ImagingPredictionPrognosis Of Prostate DiseaseProstate Cancer Grade Grouping
OBJECTIVES: T o evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the prediction of prostate cancer (PCA) aggressiveness. METHODS: In this single center cohort study, consecutive patients with histologically confirmed PCA were retrospectively enrolled. Four different ISUP grade groups (1, 2, 3, 4-5) were defined and fifty patients per group were included. Several clinical (age, PSA, PSAD, percentage of PCA infiltration) and mpMRI parameters (ADC value, signal increase on high b-value images, diameter, extraprostatic extension [EPE], cross-zonal growth) were evaluated and correlated within the four groups. Based on combined descriptors, MRI grading groups (mG1-mG3) were defined to predict PCA aggressiveness. RESULTS: In total, 200 patients (mean age 68 years, median PSA value 8.1 ng/ml) were analyzed. Between the four groups, statistically significant differences could be shown for age, PSA, PSAD, and for MRI parameters cross-zonal growth, high b-value signal increase, EPE, and ADC (p < 0.01). All examined parameters revealed a significant correlation with the histopathologic biopsy ISUP grade groups (p < 0.01), except PCA diameter (p = 0.09). A mixed linear model demonstrated the strongest prediction of the respective ISUP grade group for the MRI grading system (p < 0.01) compared to single parameters. CONCLUSIONS: MpMRI yields relevant pre-biopsy information about PCA aggressiveness. A combination of quantitative and qualitative parameters (MRI grading groups) provided the best prediction of the biopsy ISUP grade group and may improve clinical pathway and treatment planning, adding useful information beyond PI-RADS assessment category. Due to the high prevalence of higher grade PCA in patients within mG3, an early re-biopsy seems indicated in cases of negative or post-biopsy low-grade PCA. KEY POINTS: • MpMRI yields relevant pre-biopsy information about prostate cancer aggressiveness. • MRI grading in addition to PI-RADS classification seems to be helpful for a size independent early prediction of clinically significant PCA. • MRI grading groups may help urologists in clinical pathway and treatment planning, especially when to consider an early re-biopsy.
32
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Keith E. Muller, Jacob Cohen · Technometrics · 1989 · 83.9K citations
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Antti Rannikko, Marcelo Borghi et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 3K citations · Full text
Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium
Alan W. Partin, Leslie A. Mangold, Dana M Lamm et al. · Urology · 2001 · 1K citations