Journal of Asset Management · 2021 · 54 citations · 66 references
BusinessEconomicsFinanceAsset PricingForecastingMachine LearningAsset Pricing TheoryAsset Return ModelingFinancial ForecastingRisk-return AnalysisSupport Vector MachinesTime Series PredictionNeural Network PredictionNonlinear EffectsPredictive PerformancePredictive Performance EvaluationStock Market ReturnsStock Return ForecastingSupport Vector Machine ClassificationValuation Ratios
Abstract This paper evaluates the predictive performance of machine learning methods in forecasting European stock returns. Compared to a linear benchmark model, interactions and nonlinear effects help improve the predictive performance. But machine learning models must be adequately trained and tuned to overcome the high dimensionality problem and to avoid overfitting. Across all machine learning methods, the most important predictors are based on price trends and fundamental signals from valuation ratios. However, the models exhibit substantial variation in statistical predictive performance that translate into pronounced differences in economic profitability. The return and risk measures of long-only trading strategies indicate that machine learning models produce sizeable gains relative to our benchmark. Neural networks perform best, also after accounting for transaction costs. A classification-based portfolio formation, utilizing a support vector machine that avoids estimating stock-level expected returns, performs even better than the neural network architecture.
66
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Financial Economics · 1993 · 27.7K citations
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Mark M. Carhart · The Journal of Finance · 1997 · 17K citations · Full text
Robert Filders · International Journal of Forecasting · 1992 · 16.3K citations