The Impact of Clients’ and Therapists’ Characteristics on Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome

Volker Tschuschke, Margit Koemeda-Lutz, Agnes von Wyl, Aureliano Crameri, Peter Schulthess

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · 2021 · 28 citations · 33 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates how therapist–client distance and therapists’ attachment styles influence the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in a naturalistic psychotherapy setting. Researchers assessed alliance ruptures, repairs, and distance ratings from both clients and therapists and examined their correlations with treatment outcomes. Therapist‑rated distant alliance predicted alliance ruptures, which in turn predicted premature termination, but ruptures alone did not predict overall treatment outcome.

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates distances between therapists and their clients in their experience of the therapeutic alliance across the duration of the psychotherapeutic treatments in a naturalistic study. We looked at the working alliances from different vantage points—rupture, repair of ruptures, distances in the alliance impressions of both clients and therapists—and their correlation with treatment outcome. The only predictive variable of alliance ruptures was the inability of therapists to bond sufficiently with their clients regarding a sustainable working atmosphere, which could be identified through a continuous distant alliance rating by the therapists. Alliance ruptures in turn significantly predicted premature termination of treatments, whereas alliance ruptures per se did not necessarily predict treatment outcome. The paper discusses the possible role of the quality of therapists’ attachment styles as a potentially crucial variable in an effective working alliance in psychotherapy.

References

33