Publication | Closed Access
Investigation on the Structure and Properties of Na<sub>3.1</sub>Zr<sub>1.55</sub>Si<sub>2.3</sub>P<sub>0.7</sub>O<sub>11</sub> as a Solid Electrolyte and Its Application in a Seawater Battery
43
Citations
35
References
2021
Year
The ionic conductivity, bend strength, and electrochemical performance in a seawater battery (SWB) of an Na<sub>3.1</sub>Zr<sub>1.55</sub>Si<sub>2.3</sub>P<sub>0.7</sub>O<sub>11</sub> (vA-NASICON) solid electrolyte were compared to those of Na<sub>3</sub>Zr<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>12</sub> (H-NASICON). vA-NASICON exhibited three times higher total ionic conductivity (8.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> S/cm) than H-NASICON (2.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup> S/cm). This is due to the higher bulk ionic conductivity and lower grain boundary resistance of vA-NASICON. The higher bulk conductivity of vA-NASICON is a result of its higher Na content, leading to a larger concentration of charge carriers and/or the formation of a higher conductive rhombohedral phase. The lower grain boundary resistance of vA-NASICON is a result of its larger grain size and reduced ZrO<sub>2</sub> content. The bend strength of vA-NASICON (95 MPa) was 30% higher than that of the H-NASICON ceramic. The higher bend strength of vA-NASICON was attributed to its reduced ZrO<sub>2</sub> secondary phase (1.1 vol %) compared to that of H-NASICON (2.6 vol %). When the vA-NASICON ceramic was tested in the SWB as a solid electrolyte, an 8.27% improved voltage efficiency and 81% higher power output were demonstrated, compared to those of H-NASICON, as a result of its higher total ionic conductivity and mechanical strength. At the same time, the vA-NASICON membrane revealed comparable cycle life (1000 h) to that of H-NASICON. These results suggest that vA-NASICON can be a better alternative than H-NASICON for use in the SWB.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1