Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · 2021 · 20 citations · 19 references
MedicineDiagnostic SciencesInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyEarly DetectionMolecular DiagnosticsDiagnostic Test EvaluationInfectious Disease Molecular TestingInfectious Disease ScreeningRapid Diagnostic TestsSerological DiagnosticsComparative Diagnostic PerformanceRapid Antigen Detection TestingRapid Antigen TestingRapid Antigen TestsRapid Diagnostic AssaysRapid Screening TestsSensitivitySerological Rapid Tests
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in resource-poor settings remains a considerable challenge. Gold standard nucleic acid tests are expensive and depend on availability of expensive equipment and highly trained laboratory staff. More affordable and easier rapid antigen tests are an attractive alternative. This study assessed field performance of such a test in western Kenya. We conducted a prospective multi-facility field evaluation study of NowCheck COVID-19 Ag-RDT compared to gold standard PCR. Two pairs of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for comparative analysis. With 997 enrolled participants the Ag-RDT had a sensitivity 71.5% (63.2-78.6) and specificity of 97.5% (96.2-98.5) at cycle threshold value <40. Highest sensitivity of 87.7% (77.2-94.5) was observed in samples with cycle threshold values ≤30. NowCheck COVID-19 Ag-RDT performed well at multiple healthcare facilities in an African field setting. Operational specificity and sensitivity were close to WHO-recommended thresholds.
19
Responding to Covid-19 — A Once-in-a-Century Pandemic?
Bill Gates · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 1.1K citations
Jessica L. Prince-Guerra, Olivia Almendares, Leisha D. Nolen et al. · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2021 · 252 citations · Full text
Tim Peto, Dominic P. Affron, Babak Afrough et al. · EClinicalMedicine · 2021 · 218 citations · Full text