Publication | Closed Access
Stoichiometric theory shapes enzyme kinetics in paddy bulk soil but not in rhizosphere soil
16
Citations
53
References
2021
Year
Paddy Bulk SoilEngineeringSoil BiochemistryP AcquisitionPlant-soil InteractionPlant-soil RelationshipMicrobial EcologyEnvironmental MicrobiologyAvailable CarbonRhizosphereBiogeochemistryRhizosphere SoilBulk SoilSoil EcologyStoichiometric Theory ShapesEnvironmental EngineeringSoil ChemistryMicrobiologyMedicine
Abstract The available carbon (C) to phosphorus (P) ratio in the soil is regulated by extracellular hydrolases for C and P acquisition by microbes and plants. However, the stoichiometric relationship between acquiring C and P in paddy rhizosphere and bulk soils remains unclear. The objective was to explore the underlying mechanisms of C and P acquisition stoichiometry in rhizosphere and bulk soils in response to P fertilization and cellulose addition. Amendment with either cellulose or P separately caused a significant increase in the maximal velocity ( V max ) of C acquisition enzymes (β‐1,4‐glucosidase and β‐cellobiohydrolase) but decreased that of P acquisition enzymes (acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterases) in bulk soil. In contrast, lower V max values of C and P acquisition enzymes were observed in rhizosphere soil than in bulk soil. The co‐application of cellulose and P increased the V max of P acquisition enzymes in rhizosphere soil but decreased that of only alkaline phosphomonoesterase in bulk soil. Results show that P availability and labile‐C content co‐regulated the P/C acquisition ratio, and two inverse linear relationships were observed. Specifically, the P/C acquisition ratio was negatively related to both the dissolved organic C/Olsen‐P ratio and the microbial biomass C/P ratio in rhizosphere soil. However, the P/C acquisition ratio was positively related to both the dissolved organic C/Olsen‐P ratio and the microbial biomass C/P ratio in bulk soil. Overall, microbes mineralized less organic P to acquire P in paddy soil rhizosphere (i.e., containing higher labile‐C) than in bulk soil (i.e., having lower labile‐C contents).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1