Evaluating aquatic macrophytes for removing erythromycin from contaminated water: floating or submerged?

Abstract

Water contamination by antibiotics is an emerging global problem, with impacts on both public health and the environment. Erythromycin has been encountered in bodies of water throughout the world, which demands the development of efficient remediation technologies. We investigated the physiological responses and phytoremediation capacity of four species of aquatic macrophytes, two floating (<i>Salvinia molesta</i> and <i>Lemna minor</i>) and two submerged (<i>Myriophyllum aquaticum</i> and <i>Rotala rotundifolia</i>). The plants were exposed to relevant environmental concentrations of erythromycin (0 and 1.7 µg l^-1) in artificially contaminated water for seven days. Physiological evaluations evidenced the ability of that antibiotic to promote oxidative events in those plants, such as the activation of antioxidant enzymes (ascorbate peroxidase and/or catalase). <i>S. molesta</i> exposed to erythromycin demonstrated accumulations of hydrogen peroxide and oxidative damage (lipid peroxidation) that was reflected in growth reductions. The erythromycin removal efficiency of floating plants varied from 9 to 12%, while submerged species varied from 31 to 44%. As such, submerged macrophyte species demonstrated the most efficient removal of erythromycin from contaminated waters, and are therefore more indicated for antibiotic phytoremediation projects.