Sensors · 2021 · 23 citations · 33 references
EngineeringCommunicationElectrical EngineeringInternet Of ThingsMachine LearningWireless CommunicationsDeep LearningDevice-to-device CommunicationInterference ManagementWireless Channel ModelingWireless Networks5G Mobile Networks5G NetworksDeep Learning For IotEnergy-efficient CommunicationInterferenceInterference AvoidanceInterference PredictionThroughput
The co-existence of fifth-generation (5G) and Internet-of-Things (IoT) has become inevitable in many applications since 5G networks have created steadier connections and operate more reliably, which is extremely important for IoT communication. During transmission, IoT devices (IoTDs) communicate with IoT Gateway (IoTG), whereas in 5G networks, cellular users equipment (CUE) may communicate with any destination (D) whether it is a base station (BS) or other CUE, which is known as device-to-device (D2D) communication. One of the challenges that face 5G and IoT is interference. Interference may exist at BSs, CUE receivers, and IoTGs due to the sharing of the same spectrum. This paper proposes an interference avoidance distributed deep learning model for IoT and device to any destination communication by learning from data generated by the Lagrange optimization technique to predict the optimum IoTD-D, CUE-IoTG, BS-IoTD and IoTG-CUE distances for uplink and downlink data communication, thus achieving higher overall system throughput and energy efficiency. The proposed model was compared to state-of-the-art regression benchmarks, which provided a huge improvement in terms of mean absolute error and root mean squared error. Both analytical and deep learning models reached the optimal throughput and energy efficiency while suppressing interference to any destination and IoTG.
33
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2015 · 18.8K citations
Overview of 5G Security Challenges and Solutions
Ijaz Ahmad, Tanesh Kumar, Madhusanka Liyanage et al. · IEEE Communications Standards Magazine · 2018 · 439 citations