Cell · 2021 · 799 citations · 68 references
Life SciencesGeneticsMolecular BiologyDna RepairGenetic EngineeringGenome EditingCrispr-cas SystemsPrime EditingPooled Crispr ScreensPrime Editing Dna Mismatch RepairPrime Editing Efficiency OptimizationPrime Editing Small Deletion EditingPrime Editing Small Insertion EditingProtein OptimizationTransient ExpressionTransient Expression Systems
Prime editing enables precise DNA sequence changes, but cellular determinants of its efficiency are poorly understood. The authors engineered PE4 and PE5 systems that transiently express an MMR‑inhibiting protein, added silent mutations near edits to evade MMR, and optimized the prime editor protein into a PEmax architecture, collectively boosting substitution, insertion, and deletion efficiencies by up to 7.7‑fold and improving edit/indel ratios in MMR‑proficient cells. CRISPRi screens revealed that DNA mismatch repair hinders prime editing and increases indels, but the engineered PE4/PE5 systems and PEmax architecture, which inhibit MMR and incorporate silent mutations, raise editing efficiencies by up to 7.7‑fold and improve edit/indel ratios, achieving substantial gains across 191 edits in seven mammalian cell types.
While prime editing enables precise sequence changes in DNA, cellular determinants of prime editing remain poorly understood. Using pooled CRISPRi screens, we discovered that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) impedes prime editing and promotes undesired indel byproducts. We developed PE4 and PE5 prime editing systems in which transient expression of an engineered MMR-inhibiting protein enhances the efficiency of substitution, small insertion, and small deletion prime edits by an average 7.7-fold and 2.0-fold compared to PE2 and PE3 systems, respectively, while improving edit/indel ratios by 3.4-fold in MMR-proficient cell types. Strategic installation of silent mutations near the intended edit can enhance prime editing outcomes by evading MMR. Prime editor protein optimization resulted in a PEmax architecture that enhances editing efficacy by 2.8-fold on average in HeLa cells. These findings enrich our understanding of prime editing and establish prime editing systems that show substantial improvement across 191 edits in seven mammalian cell types.
68
Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA
Andrew V. Anzalone, Peyton B. Randolph, Jessie R. Davis et al. · Nature · 2019 · 4.7K citations · Full text
CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes
Luke A. Gilbert, Matthew H. Larson, Leonardo Morsut et al. · Cell · 2013 · 3.8K citations · Full text
Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation
Luke A. Gilbert, Max A. Horlbeck, Britt Adamson et al. · Cell · 2014 · 2.9K citations · Full text
In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
F. Ann Ran, Le Cong, Winston X. Yan et al. · Nature · 2015 · 2.7K citations · Full text