Physical review. A/Physical review, A · 2021 · 18 citations · 55 references
ComputingCloud ComputingComputer ScienceQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsTheory Of ComputationQuantum BitsQuantum ComputationQuantum EntanglementQuantum MeasurementBlind Quantum ComputationEntanglement WitnessesMeasurement-based Quantum ComputationMeasurement-based Quantum ComputingProtocol Formal VerificationQuantum VerificationResource Overhead AnalysisVerification Protocols
Verifiable blind quantum computation provides a cloud scenario for scalable quantum information processing. However, constructing one resource-efficient verification protocol is still an open problem. In this paper, the context of verification we consider is the measurement-based model, in which the client receives the graph state prepared by the server and performs single-qubit measurements on it to drive the computation. We first utilize three entanglement witnesses to estimate the fidelity of the prepared graph state. Applying entanglement witnesses to design the test phase, we propose verification protocols. Our protocol requires overhead in terms of copies of the graph state that scales as $O({n}^{2}logn)$, where $n$ is the number of qubits of the graph state. Furthermore, the soundness of our protocol is improved. The advantages of our protocol are derived from the fact that each entanglement witness can be implemented by the client with a fixed number of measurement settings.
55
Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki et al. · Reviews of Modern Physics · 2009 · 10K citations · Full text
Computing, Physics, Cryptography +16
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
John Preskill · Quantum · 2018 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +17
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Nature · 2019 · 7K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
Robert Raussendorf, Hans J. Briegel · Physical Review Letters · 2001 · 4.5K citations