Review of Financial Studies · 2021 · 47 citations · 88 references
BusinessCorporate GovernanceStrategyCorporate FinanceCorporate StrategyMergersAcquisition StrategyAge-based DefensesMergers And AcquisitionsTakeover DefensesAnti-takeover DefensesDeterminants Of Firm ValueFirm AgeFirm Value EffectsIndustry Life Cycle EffectsTakeover Defense DecisionsTakeover Defense ValuationTakeover Strategy
Abstract We document that the relation between firm value and the use of takeover defenses is positive for young firms but becomes negative as firms age. This value reversal pattern reflects specific changes in the costs and benefits of takeover defenses as firms age and arises because defenses are sticky and rarely removed. Firms can attenuate the value reversal by removing defenses, but do so only when the defenses become very costly and adjustment costs are low. The value reversal explains previous mixed evidence about takeover defenses and implies that firm age proxies for takeover defenses’ heterogeneous impacts on firm value. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
88
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
Yakov Amihud · Journal of Financial Markets · 2002 · 10.3K citations · Full text
Large Shareholders and Corporate Control
Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny · Journal of Political Economy · 1986 · 8.6K citations
Management ownership and market valuation
Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny · Journal of Financial Economics · 1988 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Financial Economics · 1997 · 6.2K citations