Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research · 2021 · 71 citations · 25 references
ComputingComputer ScienceOral RadiologyBiomedical ImagingComputer VisionDiagnostic Imaging3D ReconstructionImage SegmentationMandibular AnatomyMedical Image AnalysisThree-dimensional ReconstructionVolume SegmentationAutomatic SegmentationConvolutional Neural Network SegmentationConvolutional Neural NetworksDiceInter-observer ReliabilityIntraclass CorrelationMandibular SegmentationSurface-to-surface Matching
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of automatic deep learning-based method for fully automatic segmentation of the mandible from CBCTs. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: CBCT-derived mandible fully automatic segmentation. METHODS: Forty CBCT scans from healthy patients (20 females and 20 males, mean age 23.37 ± 3.34) were collected, and a manual mandible segmentation was carried out by using Mimics software. Twenty CBCT scans were randomly selected and used for training the artificial intelligence model file. The remaining 20 CBCT segmentation masks were used to test the accuracy of the CNN automatic method by comparing the segmentation volumes of the 3D models obtained with automatic and manual segmentations. The accuracy of the CNN-based method was also assessed by using the DICE Score coefficient (DSC) and by the surface-to-surface matching technique. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula were used respectively to test the intra-observer reliability and method error. Independent Student's t test was used for between-groups volumetric comparison. RESULTS: was found between the methodologies, but it was not statistically significant (P > .05). The matching percentage detected was 90.35% (±1.88) (tolerance 0.5 mm) and 96.32% ± 1.97% (tolerance 1.0 mm). The differences, measured as DSC in percentage, between the assessments done with both methods were, respectively, 2.8% and 3.1%. CONCLUSION: The tested deep learning CNN-based technology is accurate and performs as well as an experienced image reader but at much higher speed, which is of significant clinical relevance.
25
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, Trevor Darrell · 2015 · 36.9K citations
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28
Peter Flach, Meelis Kull · 2015 · 14.7K citations
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
1993 · 14.3K citations
Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting
Xingjian Shi, Zhourong Chen, Hao Wang et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2015 · 6.6K citations · Full text