Nuclear Fusion · 2021 · 39 citations · 9 references
EngineeringNuclear EngineeringFusion EngineeringNuclear InstrumentationPlasma PhysicsNuclear FusionPowder TechnologyCryogenic SystemsDisruption MitigationDissipationInjector DesignMitigationPellet FormationPelletizationThermal Runaway Mitigation
Shattered pellet injection (SPI) has been selected as the baseline technology for the disruption mitigation (DM) system for ITER. Typical SPI utilizes cryogenic cooling to desublimate low pressure (<100 mbar) gases onto a cold zone within a pipe gun barrel, forming a cylindrical pellet. Pellets are dislodged from the barrel and accelerated using either a gas driven mechanical punch or high-pressure light-gas delivered by a fast-opening valve. SPI technology developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is currently deployed and operational on DIII-D, JET, and KSTAR. These SPI systems are used in experiments for physics scaling to ITER thermal mitigation and runaway electron dissipation/avoidance. The pellet sizes used for these machines are in the range of 4 to 12.5 mm in diameter with length to diameter ratios (L/D) of ~1.5. The current plan for ITER SPI is to utilize pellets that are 28.5 mm in diameter with an L/D of ~2. Furthermore, the large pellet sizes, high steady-state magnetic fields, and limitations of operating in a radiation environment render much of the current technology unusable. In addition to technology improvements, a deeper understanding of pellet material properties, formation, and release is being developed for implementation in future SPI designs, specifically ITER.
9
Deployment of multiple shattered pellet injection systems in KSTAR
SooHwan Park, KunSu Lee, L. R. Baylor et al. · Fusion Engineering and Design · 2020 · 44 citations · Full text
Injection of multiple shattered pellets for disruption mitigation in DIII-D
J. L. Herfindal, D. Shiraki, L.R. Baylor et al. · Nuclear Fusion · 2019 · 43 citations · Full text
Design of a shattered pellet injection system on J-TEXT tokamak
Yong Li, Zhongyong Chen, Y N Wei et al. · Review of Scientific Instruments · 2018 · 37 citations