Progress and challenges in dual‐ and triple‐isotope (δ ¹⁸ O, δ ² H, Δ ¹⁷ O) analyses of environmental waters: An international assessment of laboratory performance

Abstract

No single factor or combination of factors was identifiable for poor or good performance, and underperformance came from issues like data normalization including inadequate memory and drift corrections, compromised working reference materials and underperforming instrumentation. We recommend isotope laboratories include high and low δ value controls of known isotope composition in each run. Progress in Δ¹⁷ O analyses by laser spectrometry requires extraordinary proof of performance claims and would benefit from the development of adoptable and systematic advanced data processing procedures to correct for memory and drift.