Circulation · 2021 · 172 citations · 29 references
MedicineCardiologyPharmacologyClinical CardiologyClinical PharmacologyInflammationAcute Coronary Syndrome InterventionAcute Coronary SyndromesCardiac MedicationsCardiac PharmacotherapyIschemic Heart DiseaseAnti-inflammatory ActivityAnti-inflammatory TherapeuticsInfarct Size AssessmentInfarct Size QuantificationLate Gadolinium Enhancement ImagingMyocardial Infarction PharmacotherapyPlacebo ComparatorsPrimary Efficacy Endpoints
Background: Inflammation is a key factor of myocardial damage in reperfused ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory agent, may reduce infarct size (IS) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling at the acute phase of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: In this double-blind multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients admitted for a first episode of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention to receive oral colchicine (2-mg loading dose followed by 0.5 mg twice a day) or matching placebo from admission to day 5. The primary efficacy outcome was IS determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 5 days. The relative LV end-diastolic volume change at 3 months and IS at 3 months assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were among the secondary outcomes. Results: We enrolled 192 patients, 101 in the colchicine group and 91 in the control group. At 5 days, the gadolinium enhancement–defined IS did not differ between the colchicine and placebo groups with a mean of 26 interquartile range (IQR) [16–44] versus 28.4 IQR [14–40] g of LV mass, respectively ( P =0.87). At 3 months follow-up, there was no significant difference in LV remodeling between the colchicine and placebo groups with a +2.4% (IQR, –8.3% to 11.1%) versus –1.1% (IQR, –8.0% to 9.9%) change in LV end-diastolic volume ( P =0.49). Infarct size at 3 months was also not significantly different between the colchicine and placebo groups (17 IQR [10–28] versus 18 IQR [10–27] g of LV mass, respectively; P =0.92). The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events during the treatment period was greater with colchicine than with placebo (34% versus 11%, respectively; P =0.0002). Conclusions: In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, oral administration of high-dose colchicine at the time of reperfusion and for 5 days did not reduce IS assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03156816.
29
Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction
Jean‐Claude Tardif, Simon Kouz, David D. Waters et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · 3K citations · Full text
Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease
Stefan M. Nidorf, Aernoud T.L. Fiolet, Arend Mosterd et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Pharmacology +15
Effect of Cyclosporine on Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Christophe Piot, Pierre Croisille, Patrick Staat et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 1.3K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Pharmacology +11