Brain · 2021 · 68 citations · 33 references
MedicineNeurologyNeurosciencePain ManagementPain MedicinePain ScienceMotor Cortex StimulationNeuromodulation For PainNeurostimulationPain AssessmentPain MeasurementPain OutcomesImplantable Peripheral Nerve StimulationNeuromodulation For Neuropathic PainNeuromodulation Outcomes AssessmentNeuropathic Pain ReductionNeuropathic Pain ReliefOpen-label TrialsOutcome Measurement In NeuromodulationPain Relief Assessment
Motor cortex stimulation via surgically implanted electrodes has been used as an off-label treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, but its efficacy has not been fully established. We aimed to objectively study the efficacy of motor cortex stimulation and characterize potential predictors of response. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single centre trial, we recruited 18 patients with chronic neuropathic pain who did not adequately respond to conventional treatment and had a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score ≥6. Patients were initially assigned to receive 3 months of active ('on') or sham ('off') stimulation in a double-blind cross-over phase. This was followed by a 3-month single-blind phase, and 6 months of open-label follow-up. A meaningful response in our trial was defined as a ≥30% or 2-point reduction in NRS scores during active stimulation. Using Bayesian statistics, we found a 41.4% probability of response towards on versus off motor cortex stimulation. The probability of improvement during active stimulation (double-blind, single-blind and open-label phases) compared to baseline was 47.2-68.5%. Thirty nine per cent of the patients were considered long-term responders, 71.4% of whom had facial pain, phantom limb pain or complex regional pain syndrome. In contrast, 72.7% of non-responders had either post-stroke pain or pain associated with brachial plexus avulsion. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had a substantial postoperative analgesic effect after electrode insertion in the absence of stimulation. Individuals with diagnoses associated with a good postoperative outcome or those who developed an insertional effect had a near 100% probability of response to motor cortex stimulation. In summary, we found that ∼40% of patients responded to motor cortex stimulation, particularly those who developed an insertional effect or had specific clinical conditions that seemed to predict an appropriate postoperative response.
33
<i>Stan</i> : A Probabilistic Programming Language
Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman, Matthew D. Hoffman et al. · Journal of Statistical Software · 2017 · 7.4K citations · Full text
EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain
G. Cruccu, Tipu Z. Aziz, Luis Garcı́a-Larrea et al. · European Journal of Neurology · 2007 · 692 citations
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17