Publication | Closed Access
Parallel Hybrid-Electric Powertrain Sizing on Regional Turboprop Aircraft with Consideration for Certification Performance Requirements
13
Citations
5
References
2021
Year
EngineeringHybrid Powertrain AircraftEnergy EfficiencyRegional Turboprop AircraftHybrid Electric VehicleView Video PresentationPowertrain SimulationAirframe IntegrationElectrical EngineeringAerospace Electric PowerComputer EngineeringHybrid Energy SystemCertification Performance RequirementsHybrid VehicleAerospace Propulsion SystemsPropulsionAerospace EngineeringEnergy ManagementOei ClimbIn-space Propulsion SystemsGas Turbine Engine
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2443.vid Challenging emission reduction targets and significant growth of air transport market motivate important research of novel propulsion systems with alternative energy sources and lowered CO2 emissions. For short regional flights, hybrid-electric turboprop is seen as a promising alternative to reduce fuel burn. As conventional propulsion aircraft, hybrid powertrain aircraft must meet all certification requirements, especially one engine inoperative climbs (OEI). While classical Gas Turbine (GT) downsizing design approach could reduce fuel burn, it might not meet the OEI missed approach performance required by the certification authorities if the batteries are depleted at end of mission. Hence, a conceptual approach through mission analysis and optimization is introduced to evaluate the impact of OEI climb requirement on powertrain design and performance. The parallel hybrid-electric powertrain is sized on a retrofitted regional aircraft with 2030 near future technology using two design approaches. The first hybrid-electric design uses downsized GT while the second keeps original GT supplemented with an electric motor. The two designs are then compared to a baseline, original conventional GT propulsion system with fuel mass optimized for the same target mission. For battery pack with 200 Wh/kg and 10000lb of payload mass, hybrid electric systems show 5% fuel burn benefit compared to a conventional gas turbine propulsion system, when constraints such as energy reserves for re-routing to alternate airfields, loitering time, and missed approach OEI Climb performance, are taken into account. The downsized gas turbine solution, that needs to use battery energy during OEI climb, results in a penalty of 12.9% more fuel burn during the target mission, due to the extra weight of the unused emergency battery, resulting in a similar mission fuel burn as parallel hybrid designs that use the original full-size GT and are therefore able to perform OEI Climb without electric assistance.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1