Publication | Closed Access
Resistivity scaling in epitaxial MAX-phase Ti4SiC3(0001) layers
19
Citations
57
References
2021
Year
Materials ScienceMagnetismMaterial AnalysisEngineeringOxide ElectronicsSmall ResistivitySurface ScienceApplied PhysicsCondensed Matter PhysicsSitu Transport MeasurementsSemiconductor MaterialThin FilmsMolecular Beam EpitaxyEpitaxial GrowthLow Resistivity ScalingMagnetic MaterialsResistivity ScalingMagnetoresistance
In situ transport measurements on 5.8–92.1 nm thick epitaxial Ti4SiC3(0001) layers are used to experimentally verify the previously predicted low resistivity scaling. Magnetron co-sputtering from three elemental sources at 1000 °C onto 12-nm-thick TiC(111) nucleation layers on Al2O3(0001) substrates yields epitaxial growth with Ti4SiC3(0001) || Al2O3(0001) and Ti4SiC3(101¯0) || Al2O3(21¯1¯0), a low and thickness-independent surface roughness of 0.6 ± 0.2 nm, and a measured stoichiometric composition. The room-temperature resistivity ρ increases slightly with decreasing thickness, from ρ = 35.2 ± 0.4 to 37.5 ± 1.1 μΩ cm for d = 92.1–5.8 nm, and similarly from 9.5 ± 0.2 to 11.0 ± 0.4 μΩ cm at 77 K, indicating only a minor effect of electron surface scattering on ρ. Data analysis with the classical Fuchs–Sondheimer model yields a room-temperature bulk resistivity ρo = 35.1 ± 0.4 μΩ cm in the basal plane and suggests effective mean free paths λ = 1.1 ± 0.6 at 293 K and λ = 3.0 ± 2.0 nm at 77 K if assuming completely diffuse electron surface scattering. First-principles calculations predict an anisotropic Ti4SiC3 Fermi surface and a product ρoλ = 19.3 × 10−16 Ω m2 in the basal plane. This value is six times larger than that predicted previously and five times larger than the measured temperature-independent effective ρoλ = (3.8 ± 2.1) × 10−16 Ω m2. This deviation can be explained by a high experimental electron scattering specularity of p = 0.8 for Ti4SiC3(0001) surfaces. Air exposure causes a 4% room-temperature resistivity increase for d = 5.8 nm, indicating a decrease in the surface scattering specularity Δp = −0.19. The overall results show that Ti4SiC3 is not directly applicable as an interconnect material due to its relatively large ρo. However, the particularly small resistivity scaling with an effective λ that is more than an order of magnitude smaller than that of Cu confirms the potential of MAX phase materials for high-conductivity narrow interconnects.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1