Toward general regime maps for cohesive‐particle flows: Force versus energy‐based descriptions and relevant dimensionless groups

Abstract

Abstract Much confusion exists on whether force‐ or energy‐based descriptions of cohesive‐particle interactions are more appropriate. We hypothesize a force‐based description is appropriate when enduring‐contacts dominate and an energy‐based description when contacts are brief in nature. Specifically, momentum is transferred through force‐chains when enduring‐contacts dominate and particles need to overcome a cohesive force to induce relative motion, whereas particles experiencing brief contacts transfer momentum through collisions and must overcome cohesion‐enhanced energy losses to avoid agglomeration. This hypothesis is tested via an attempt to collapse the dimensionless, dependent variable characterizing a given system against two dimensionless numbers: A generalized bond number, Bo G –ratio of maximum cohesive force to the force driving flow, and a new Agglomerate number, Ag–ratio of critical cohesive energy to the granular energy. A gamut of experimental and simulation systems (fluidized bed, hopper, etc.), and cohesion sources (van der Waals, humidity, etc.), are considered. For enduring‐contact systems, collapse occurs with Bo G but not Ag, and vice versa for brief‐contact systems, thereby providing support for the hypothesis. An apparent discrepancy with past work is resolved, and new insight into Geldart's classification is gleaned.