BMJ Open · 2021 · 21 citations · 15 references
MedicineInfectious DiseasesSurgeryDrug DeliveryHemostasisPerioperative Infection PreventionCatheter CareCatheter ManagementCatheter-associated Infection PreventionIntravenous Drug DeliveryThrombosis ManagementThrombosis PreventionCatheter-associated Thrombosis PreventionCentral Venous Catheter Infection PreventionIntravascular Catheter Infection PreventionPolyurethane MaterialsPressure Control ValvesPressure Relief ValvesPressure Safety ValvesPressure-reducing Valves
Introduction Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are vital for the delivery of medical therapies, but up to 30% of PICCs are associated with complications such as deep vein thrombosis or infection. The integration of antimicrobial and hydrophobic catheter materials, and pressure-activated valves, into polyurethane PICCs are innovations designed to prevent infective and/or thrombotic complications. Methods and analysis A multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with two experimental arms ((1) hydrophobic PICC (with pressure-activated valve); (2) chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated PICC (with external clamp)) and one control group ((3) conventional polyurethane PICC (with external clamp)). Recruitment of 1098 adult and paediatric patients will take place over 2 years at three tertiary-referral hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Patients are eligible for inclusion if their PICC is to be inserted for medical treatment, with a vascular size sufficient to support a 4-Fr PICC or larger, and with informed consent. The primary outcome is PICC failure , a composite of thrombotic (venous thrombosis, breakage and occlusion) and infective complications (PICC-associated bloodstream infection and local infection). Secondary outcomes include: all-cause PICC complication; thrombotic complications; infective complications; adverse events (local or systemic reaction); PICC dwell time; patient/parent satisfaction; and healthcare costs. Differences between both intervention groups and the control group will be compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Effect estimates will be presented as HRs with corresponding 95% CI. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/QCHQ/48682) and Griffith University (Ref. No. 2019/094). Results will be published. Trial registration number ACTRN12619000022167.
15
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert J. Thielke et al. · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · 2008 · 51.7K citations · Full text
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Michael Herdman, Claire Gudex, Andrew Lloyd et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2011 · 10K citations · Full text
Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D
Nora Wille, Gouke J. Bonsel, Kristina Burström et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2010 · 896 citations · Full text