Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2021 · 154 citations · 14 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyMetastasisCancer DiagnosisGastric CancerGastrointestinal ImagingGastrointestinal RadiologyPositron Emission TomographyTumor DetectionGastric Cancer ImagingGastrointestinal Neoplasms ImagingMetastatic Gastric CancerPrimary Tumor AssessmentPrimary Tumor CharacterizationPrimary Tumor DetectionTracer Uptake QuantificationVisceral Metastases
We sought to evaluate the performance of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 (<b><sup>68</sup></b>Ga-FAPI) PET/MR for the diagnosis of primary tumor and metastatic lesions in patients with gastric carcinomas and to compare the results with those of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty patients with histologically proven gastric carcinomas were recruited, and each patient underwent both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <b><sup>68</sup></b>Ga-FAPI PET/MR. A visual scoring system was established to compare the detectability of primary tumors and metastases in different organs or regions (the peritoneum, abdominal lymph nodes, supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes, liver, ovary, bone, and other tissues). The original SUV<sub>max</sub> and normalized SUV<sub>max</sub> (calculated by dividing a lesion’s original SUV<sub>max</sub> with the SUV<sub>mean</sub> of the descending aorta) of selected lesions on both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/MR were measured. Original/normalized SUV<sub>max-FAPI</sub> and SUV<sub>max-FDG</sub> were compared for patient-based (including a single lesion with the highest activity uptake in each organ/region) and lesion-based (including all lesions [≤5] or the 5 lesions with highest activity [>5]) analyses, respectively. <b>Results:</b> The 20 recruited patients (median age: 56.0 y; range: 29–70 y) included 9 men and 11 women, 14 patients for initial staging and 6 for recurrence detection. <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET was superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET for primary tumor detection (100.00% [14/14] vs. 71.43% [10/14]; <i>P</i> = 0.034), and the former had higher tracer uptake levels (<i>P</i> < 0.05). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET was superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in both patient-based and lesion-based evaluation except for the metastatic lesions in supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes and ovaries. Additionally, multiple sequences of MR images were beneficial for the interpretation of hepatic metastases in 3 patients, uterine and rectal metastases in 1 patient, ovarian lesions in 7 patients, and osseous metastases in 2 patients. <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/MR outperformed <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in visualizing the primary and most metastatic lesions of gastric cancer and might be a promising method, with the potential of replacing <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT.
14
<sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer
Clemens Kratochwil, Paul Flechsig, Thomas Lindner et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2019 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Frederik L. Giesel, Clemens Kratochwil, Thomas Lindner et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2018 · 722 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Haojun Chen, Yizhen Pang, Jingxun Wu et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2020 · 540 citations