International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology · 2021 · 15 citations · 14 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringMaterials EngineeringFinite Element AnalysisMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsPavement EngineeringAsphalt MaterialsPavement DesignPavement MaterialsPavement Performance AnalysisPavement Structural AnalysisPermeable PavementsCompaction Under Wet ConditionsPavement Response AnalysisPavement Response ModelingPavement Strain AnalysisPavement Structural PerformancePermeable Pavement AnalysisPermeable Pavement ModelingStructural Performance
Permeable pavements play an important role in the mitigation of stormwater runoff and urban heat island effect. However, due to low strength and clogging, permeable pavements are always applied in light traffic areas. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the structural performance of permeable pavements under different conditions. In this paper, the performance of two permeable pavement structures (fully-permeable (FP) pavement and semi-permeable (SP) pavement) under dry and wet conditions is analyzed with the finite element method (FEM) modeling and one-third scaled MMLS3 test. A preliminary FEM model was established and empirical values of modulus are used. To make the model more closely simulate the actual conditions of the pavement, the modulus was calibrated according to the MMLS3 test results. The results of resilient strain and calibrated modulus of two structures under dry and wet conditions were analyzed, and the SP structure appears better cracking and moisture damage resistances. The modulus increases firstly and then decreases with the change of loading repetitions, which is considered to be caused by the combined action of further compaction of load and temperature. Since the change rate of surface layer modulus of the SP structure with loading repetitions is higher than that of FP structure, and only the base material of the two structures is different. It can be considered that the base layer modulus will affect the bottom strain of the surface layer, thus affecting the surface layer modulus. Furthermore, by calculating the difference between the base layer and the surface layer, it is found that the smaller the modulus gap between them, the smaller the change rate of the surface layer modulus.
14
Masoud Kayhanian, Hui Li, John Harvey et al. · International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology · 2019 · 101 citations · Full text
Sang‐Hyun Chun, Kukjoo Kim, James Greene et al. · Construction and Building Materials · 2015 · 89 citations
Guoyang Lu, Yuhong Wang, Hui Li et al. · International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology · 2019 · 42 citations · Full text
Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Materials Engineering +17