Publication | Open Access
Applying Machine Learning to Identify Anti-Vaccination Tweets during the COVID-19 Pandemic
62
Citations
31
References
2021
Year
Llm Fine-tuningAnti-vaccination AttitudesMachine LearningEngineeringCommunicationMultilingual PretrainingVaccine HesitancyLarge Language ModelCorpus LinguisticsLanguage ProcessingText MiningCovid-19Word EmbeddingsNatural Language ProcessingSocial MediaReverse VaccinologyData ScienceComputational LinguisticsInfection ControlPublic HealthMachine TranslationAnti-vaccination TweetsNlp TaskCovid-19 PandemicDisease SurveillanceMedical Language ProcessingDeep LearningEpidemiologyVaccinationMedicine
Anti-vaccination attitudes have been an issue since the development of the first vaccines. The increasing use of social media as a source of health information may contribute to vaccine hesitancy due to anti-vaccination content widely available on social media, including Twitter. Being able to identify anti-vaccination tweets could provide useful information for formulating strategies to reduce anti-vaccination sentiments among different groups. This study aims to evaluate the performance of different natural language processing models to identify anti-vaccination tweets that were published during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the performance of the bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) and the bidirectional long short-term memory networks with pre-trained GLoVe embeddings (Bi-LSTM) with classic machine learning methods including support vector machine (SVM) and naïve Bayes (NB). The results show that performance on the test set of the BERT model was: accuracy = 91.6%, precision = 93.4%, recall = 97.6%, F1 score = 95.5%, and AUC = 84.7%. Bi-LSTM model performance showed: accuracy = 89.8%, precision = 44.0%, recall = 47.2%, F1 score = 45.5%, and AUC = 85.8%. SVM with linear kernel performed at: accuracy = 92.3%, Precision = 19.5%, Recall = 78.6%, F1 score = 31.2%, and AUC = 85.6%. Complement NB demonstrated: accuracy = 88.8%, precision = 23.0%, recall = 32.8%, F1 score = 27.1%, and AUC = 62.7%. In conclusion, the BERT models outperformed the Bi-LSTM, SVM, and NB models in this task. Moreover, the BERT model achieved excellent performance and can be used to identify anti-vaccination tweets in future studies.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
1997 | 93.8K | |
1995 | 39.8K | |
2014 | 33.2K | |
1997 | 9.6K | |
1994 | 8.3K | |
2005 | 5.2K | |
1998 | 3.2K | |
2018 | 1.8K | |
2018 | 1.8K | |
2016 | 837 |
Page 1
Page 1