Optimization and Engineering · 2021 · 20 citations · 25 references
ManagementAerospace EngineeringAlgorithmsOptimizationSchedulingEvolutionary OptimizationGenetic AlgorithmsMulti-objective OptimizationMulti-objective SchedulingBenchmarking Multi-objective AlgorithmsEvolutionary Multi-objective SchedulingMulti-objective Evolutionary AlgorithmsMulti-objective Evolutionary ComputationMulti-objective Evolutionary OptimizationMulti-objective Scheduling MetaheuristicsMultiobjective Test Problems
Abstract The ground station scheduling problem is a complex scheduling problem involving multiple objectives. Evolutionary techniques for multi-objective optimization are becoming popular among different fields, due to their effectiveness in obtaining a set of trade-off solutions. In contrast to some conventional methods, that aggregate the objectives into one weighted-sum objective function, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms manage to find a set of solutions in the Pareto-optimal front. Selecting one algorithm, however, for a specific problem adds additional challenge. In this paper the ground station scheduling problem was solved through six different evolutionary multi-objective algorithms, the NSGA-II, NSGA-III, SPEA2, GDE3, IBEA, and MOEA/D. The goal is to test their efficacy and performance to a number of benchmark static instances of the ground scheduling problem. Benchmark instances are of different sizes, allowing further testing of the behavior of the algorithms to different dimensionality of the problem. The solutions are compared to the recent solutions of a weighted-sum approach solved by the GA. The results show that all multi-objective algorithms manage to find as good solution as the weighted-sum, while giving more additional alternatives. The decomposition-based MOEA/D outperforms the rest of the algorithms for the specific problem in almost all aspects.
25
Kalyanmoy Deb, Himanshu Jain · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · 2013 · 6.8K citations
Joaquín Derrac, Salvador García, Daniel Molina et al. · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · 2011 · 5.4K citations