New Microbes and New Infections · 2021 · 27 citations · 17 references
MedicineInfectious DiseasesMolecular BiologyMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular VirologyVirologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingNucleic Acid ExtractionPathogen DetectionRespiratory Pathogen DiagnosticsRna-based DiagnosticsViral DiagnosticsCoronavirus DiagnosticsMolecular Respiratory Pathogen DetectionRespiratory MucosaRespiratory Pathogen TestingRibonucleic Acid ExtractionRna ExtractionSars-cov-2 InfectionViral Nucleic Acid Extraction
Diagnostic testing is important for managing the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). We developed an optimized protocol for SARS-CoV-2 RNA extraction from the surface of the respiratory mucosa with nasopharyngeal swabs and compared the sensitivity of RNA extraction methods. RNA extraction was performed using three different procedures (TRIzol, QIAamp, VMT-TRIzol) from nine positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. SARS-CoV-2 was detected by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using a detection kit for SARS-CoV-2 (Sun Yat-sen University). Compared to RT-PCR results, there were no discernible differences in detection rates when comparing the three different extraction procedures. On the basis of these results, the use of TRIzol as a transport medium and RNA extraction method for SARS-CoV-2 detection may be a helpful alternative for laboratories facing shortages of commercial testing kits.
17
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Chaolin Huang, Yeming Wang, Xingwang Li et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 51.8K citations · Full text
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019
Na Zhu, Dingyu Zhang, Xingwang Li et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 30.4K citations · Full text
Xiaobo Yang, Yu Yuan, Jiqian Xu et al. · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · 2020 · 10.7K citations · Full text
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
Victor M. Corman, Olfert Landt, Marco Kaiser et al. · Eurosurveillance · 2020 · 8.2K citations · Full text