BMC Urology · 2021 · 26 citations · 16 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyInterventional RadiologyUrogenital SurgeryUrologic SurgeryOveractive Bladder ManagementUreteral SurgeryUrinary Tract Obstruction EvaluationGlomerular Filtration Rate MeasurementRefractory Overactive BladderRetroperitoneal FibrosisSerum Creatinine AssessmentUreteral Stent Placement
BACKGROUND: Refractory non-malignant ureterostenosis is challenging to treat. The experience to treat the stenosis primarily cause by retroperitoneal fibrosis with the Resonance and Allium metallic stent is still limited. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two stents and provide alternative treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for patients with non-malignant ureterostenosis and treated with the Resonance and Allium stents from March 2011 to September 2020 in our department. The efficacy was evaluated by the change of serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the proportion of GFR of the affected side and hydronephrosis grade. The safety was evaluated by postoperative presence of moderate or severe overactive bladder (OAB), recurrent urinary infection, pain, stent displacement, encrustation and re-obstruction. RESULTS: 33 patients were eligible for the study, including 18 cases treated by the Resonance stents and 15 patients treated by the Allium stents. The patients of two groups had similar age and gender proportion. The cause of ureterostenosis was mainly retroperitoneal fibrosis in both groups but the Resonance group had more idiopathic cases. Follow-up time was significantly longer in the Resonance group than the Allium group (36.2 ± 24.0 vs 9.4 ± 5.0 months, p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvement or maintenance of serum creatinine level, GFR, the GFR proportion of the affected side and hydronephrosis grade after treatment. The Resonance group presented significant higher incidence of moderate or severe OAB, recurrent urinary infection and pain, while the Allium group showed significant more cases of re-obstruction. CONCLUSION: Both the Resonance and Allium stent can relieve the non-malignant refractory ureterostenosis effectively. The Resonance stent may cause more irritable symptoms while the Allium stent may have a higher rate of re-obstruction. The long term efficacy and safety of the Allium stent in treating non-malignant refractory ureterostenosis requires further study.
16
Augusto Vaglio, Carlo Salvarani, Carlo Buzio · The Lancet · 2006 · 607 citations · Full text
Ureteral Obstruction: Is the Full Metallic Double-Pigtail Stent the Way to Go?
Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Iason Kyriazis et al. · European Urology · 2009 · 126 citations
Application of resonance metallic stents for ureteral obstruction
Hung‐Jen Wang, Tze Yu Lee, Hao‐Lun Luo et al. · British Journal of Urology · 2010 · 86 citations