New England Journal of Medicine · 2021 · 1.3K citations · 22 references
Veterinary MedicineImmunologyInfectious DiseasesEmerging Infectious DiseasesVaccinologyVirologyClinical Vaccine TrialsVaccinationVaccine EffectivenessVaccine EfficacyVaccine SafetyViral VaccinesCoronavirus VaccinesEfficacy Against InfectionPediatric Vaccine EfficacyPlacebo ComparatorsSars-cov-2 InfectionVaccine Clinical Trial DesignVaccine Efficacy EvaluationVaccine Efficacy Trials
BACKGROUND: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. METHODS: viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. RESULTS: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).
22
Merryn Voysey, Sue Ann Costa Clemens, Shabir A. Madhi et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 5K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Preventive Medicine +17
Pedro M. Folegatti, Katie Ewer, Parvinder K. Aley et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 2.6K citations · Full text
SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies
Christopher O. Barnes, Claudia A. Jette, Morgan E. Abernathy et al. · Nature · 2020 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Denis Y. Logunov, Inna V. Dolzhikova, Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov et al. · The Lancet · 2021 · 1.8K citations · Full text