Publication | Open Access
Earth's Magnetic Field Strength and the Cretaceous Normal Superchron: New Data From Costa Rica
16
Citations
95
References
2021
Year
EngineeringContinental TectonicsEarth System ScienceGeologic Time ScaleEarth ScienceGeophysicsPlate TectonicsCretaceous Normal SuperchronGeological DataEnvironmental MagnetismGeochronologyPolarity Interval LengthGeodesyNeotectonicsMarine GeologyMagnetic Field StrengthGeographyGeologyTectonicsGeomagnetic FieldGeochemistryAstrochronologyMagnetic Field
Abstract Constraining the long‐term variability and average of the Earth's magnetic field strength is fundamental to understanding the characteristics and behavior of the geomagnetic field. Questions remain about the strength of the average field, and the relationship between strength and reversal frequency, due to the dispersion of data from key time intervals. Here, we focus on the Cretaceous Normal Superchron (CNS; 121‐84 Ma), during which there were no reversals. We present new intensity results from 41 submarine basaltic glass (SBG) sites collected on the Nicoya Peninsula and Murcièlago Islands, Costa Rica. New and revised 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and biostratigraphic age constraints from previous studies indicate ages from 141 to 65 Ma. One site with an age of 135.1 ± 1.5 Ma (2σ) gave a reliable intensity result of 34 ± 8 µT (equivalent to a virtual axial dipole moment, VADM, value of 88 ± 20 ZAm 2 ), three sites from 121 to 112 Ma, spanning the onset of the CNS, vary from 21 ± 1 to 34 ± 4 µT (53 ± 3 to 87 ± 10 ZAm 2 ). These results from the CNS are all higher than the long‐term average of ∼42 ZAm 2 and data from Suhongtu, Mongolia (46–53 ZAm 2 ) and are similar to the Troodos Ophiolite, Cyprus (81 ZAm 2 , reinterpreted in this study). Together with the reinterpreted data, the new Costa Rica results suggest that the strength of the geomagnetic field was approximately the same both before and after the onset of the CNS. Therefore, the data do not support a strict correlation between polarity interval length and the strength of the magnetic field.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1