PubMed · 2021 · 11 citations · 0 references
Natural SciencesEnvironmental SciencesSoil SciencesEnvironmental ToxicologyIndustrial ToxicologySoil ChemistryHeavy Metal ContaminationHeavy Metal Risk AssessmentIndustrial PollutionRisk Assessment For Contaminated SoilsSoil ContaminationSoil PollutionHeavy Metal ContaminantsHeavy Metal Contamination AssessmentHeavy Metal Contamination Risk AssessmentIndustrial Soil ContaminationIndustrial Soil PollutionPollution SourcesSoil Heavy Metal AssessmentSoil Risk Assessment
, respectively, which exceeds standards by 100%, 89.44%, and 3.40%, respectively. Accounting for the influence of pollution sources, terrain, runoff erosion, and prevailing wind direction, all heavy metal concentrations were higher in the south direction, lower in the north direction. The concentrations of Cd and Cu in soil profile samples decreased with depth, with highest concentrations at the surface, indicating the strong effect of industrial activities. Arsenic concentrations varied little with soil depth due to its strong migration ability in alkaline soil, again suggesting an industrial source. Among them, the soil of study area was severely contaminated by Cd and Cu (Level 5). Cd poses a severe potential ecological risk (Level 5) and Cu poses a medium risk (Level 2) in the study soils, while other heavy metals show low potential ecological risk (Level 1). The order of the risk identified was Cd > Cu > Ni > As > Pb > Cr > Zn. In addition, the combined potential ecological risk of heavy metals in the target area is severe. The principal component analysis showed that the high As, Cd, and Cu contents are mainly derived from industrial areas. Therefore, it is urgent to remediate Cd and Cu soil contamination in this area and implement precautions to limit As contamination.