Publication | Open Access
FAPI-04 PET/CT Using [18F]AlF Labeling Strategy: Automatic Synthesis, Quality Control, and In Vivo Assessment in Patient
54
Citations
26
References
2021
Year
<sup>68</sup>Ga labeled FAPI is the current standard for FAPI-PET, but its batch activity is limited. [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 is a promising alternative combining the advantages of a chelator-based radiolabeling method with the unique properties of fluorine-18. The objective of this study was to develop a quick automatic method for synthesis of [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 using a AllinOne synthesis system, and perform PET imaging with [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 on patients. [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 was produced, and its quality control was conducted by HPLC equipped with a radioactive detector. [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging was performed in normal BALB/c mice (n = 3) and 4T1 breast cancer models (n = 3) to determine its biodistribution. Then [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging were performed in an invasive ductal carcinoma patient (female, 54 years old). The synthesis time of [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 was about 25 min, and the radiochemical yield was 26.4 ± 1.5% (attenuation correction, n = 10). The radiochemical purity was above 99.0% and was above 98.0% after 6 h. The product was colorless transparent solution with pH value of 7.0-7.5, and the specific activity was 49.41 ± 3.19 GBq/μmol. PET/CT imaging in mice showed that physiological uptake of [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 was mainly in the biliary system and bladder, and [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 highly concentrated in tumor xenografts. PET/CT imaging in the patient showed that [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 obtained high tumor background ratio (TBR) value of 8.44 in segment V and VI, while TBR value was 2.55 by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 could be synthesized with high radiochemical yield and batch production by AllinOne module and show excellent diagnosis performance in cancer patients.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1