Radiation Oncology · 2021 · 95 citations · 20 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologySurgical OncologyTreatment PlanningAdaptive RadiotherapyCancer Treatment PlanningExternal Beam RadiotherapyGastrointestinal Cancer RadiotherapyRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningAdaptive Radiotherapy PlanningClinical Target Volume CoverageClinical Target Volume MarginDeformable RegistrationOnline Adaptive RadiotherapyRadiotherapy Dose PlanningRectal Cancer RadiotherapyTreatment Delivery Workflow
BACKGROUND: Online adaptive radiotherapy has the potential to reduce toxicity for patients treated for rectal cancer because smaller planning target volumes (PTV) margins around the entire clinical target volume (CTV) are required. The aim of this study is to describe the first clinical experience of a Conebeam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive workflow for rectal cancer, evaluating timing of different steps in the workflow, plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients eligible for 5 × 5 Gy pre-operative radiotherapy were treated on a ring-based linear accelerator with a multidisciplinary team present at the treatment machine for each fraction. The accelerator is operated using an integrated software platform for both treatment planning and delivery. In all directions for all CTVs a PTV margin of 5 mm was used, except for the cranial/caudal borders of the total CTV where a margin of 8 mm was applied. A reference plan was generated based on a single planning CT. After aligning the patient the online adaptive procedure started with acquisition of a CBCT. The planning CT scan was registered to the CBCT using deformable registration and a synthetic CT scan was generated. With the support of artificial intelligence, structure guided deformation and the synthetic CT scan contours were adapted by the system to match the anatomy on the CBCT. If necessary, these contours were adjusted before a new plan was generated. A second and third CBCT were acquired to validate the new plan with respect to CTV coverage just before and after treatment delivery, respectively. Treatment was delivered using volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT). All steps in this process were defined and timed. RESULTS: On average the timeslot needed at the treatment machine was 34 min. The process of acquiring a CBCT, evaluating and adjusting the contours, creating the new plan and verifying the CTV on the CBCT scan took on average 20 min. Including delivery and post treatment verification this was 26 min. Manual adjustments of the target volumes were necessary in 50% of fractions. Plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: First clinical experience with CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy shows it is feasible for rectal cancer. Trial registration Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and was retrospectively approved by the Medical Ethics review Committee of the Academic Medical Center (W21_087 # 21.097; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
20
Koen Peeters, Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde, J.W.H. Leer et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2005 · 948 citations · Full text
Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Anthony J. Henrys, Elisabeth J Adams et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2006 · 178 citations