Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2021 · 37 citations · 25 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMolecular MedicineMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular VirologyVirologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory InfectionsRespiratory Infectious DiseasesViral InfectionsViral PathologyCoronavirus DiagnosticsFormalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue AnalysisParaffin-embedded Tissue StainingPolymerase Chain Reaction DetectionRespiratory Viral PathologyReverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-pcr)Sars-cov-2 InfectionSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome
CONTEXT.—: Small case series have evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or RNA in situ hybridization (RNAish). OBJECTIVE.—: To compare droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, IHC, and RNAish to detect SARS-CoV-2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in a large series of lung specimens from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. DESIGN.—: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and RNAish used commercially available probes; IHC used clone 1A9. Twenty-six autopsies of COVID-19 patients with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 62 lung specimens, 22 heart specimens, 2 brain specimens, and 1 liver, and 1 umbilical cord were included. Control cases included 9 autopsy lungs from patients with other infections/inflammation and virus-infected tissue or cell lines. RESULTS.—: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction had the highest sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 (96%) when compared with IHC (31%) and RNAish (36%). All 3 tests had a specificity of 100%. Agreement between droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and IHC or RNAish was fair (κ = 0.23 and κ = 0.35, respectively). Agreement between IHC and in situ hybridization was substantial (κ = 0.75). Interobserver reliability was almost perfect for IHC (κ = 0.91) and fair to moderate for RNAish (κ = 0.38-0.59). Lung tissues from patients who died earlier after onset of symptoms revealed higher copy numbers by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (P = .03, Pearson correlation = -0.65) and were more likely to be positive by RNAish (P = .02) than lungs from patients who died later. We identified SARS-CoV-2 in hyaline membranes, in pneumocytes, and rarely in respiratory epithelium. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction showed low copy numbers in 7 autopsy hearts from ProteoGenex Inc. All other extrapulmonary tissues were negative. CONCLUSIONS.—: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction was the most sensitive and highly specific test to identify SARS-CoV-2 in lung specimens from COVID-19 patients.
25
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
Wei‐jie Guan, Zhengyi Ni, Yu Hu et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 31.2K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine +10
Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study
Tao Chen, Di Wu, Huilong Chen et al. · BMJ · 2020 · 4.2K citations · Full text